worcester
western mass
vermont
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
seattle
sarasota
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
dc
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
asheville
arkansas
arizona
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
toscana
torun
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
saint-petersburg
russia
romania
roma
portugal
poland
piemonte
patras
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
napoli
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lombardia
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
emilia-romagna
cyprus
croatia
calabria
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant
abruzzoThis site made manifest by dadaIMC software
Uhhh...look who's talking
Date Edited: 30 Sep 2001 08:37:54 AM
Being anti-ideology means rejecting all forms of an absolute answer for a new society while you are struggling for change. This includes CAPITALISM. There are no exceptions. Capitalism is not some sort of special exception. I do not know what the hell makes you think this. Considering how absolute and direct it is, to claim it is not an ideology is ridiculous.
I would say that anarchism is the closest to this, mainly because very few absolutes (no hierarchy, instiutional or economic) are laid down beforehand, everything else is left to the people involved when they make their decisions.
But it is still an ideology. The only way to break free is to reject any "ism" as a goal, and only focus on change.