I don't know anything about OJ except that a jury of piers found him not guilty.

However, I have my suspicions about our Furher. Lets give our Furher a chance in front of the jury for the charge of mass wrongful death.

If the jury finds him not guilty - as OJ's did, then contrary to the title of this offer, both would have a legal basis for denial and their lack of "repitance".

OJ has earned it - he's not guilty - let's get der FUrher in front of the bar. Then, if he is found nnot guilty, the autheor of this piece could [plausibly] link them as both being found innocent.

The days of WMDs and "evil" slurs have past. I don't understand why this author is makeing a comparison between a man who has been found innocent and a man we all know is guilty.

I don't get it!

It's Zionism Stupid!