worcester
western mass
vermont
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
seattle
sarasota
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
dc
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
asheville
arkansas
arizona
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
toscana
torun
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
sardegna
russia
romania
roma
portugal
poland
piemonte
patras
paris/Île-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
nottingham imc
norway
northern england
nice
netherlands
napoli
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
london
lombardia
linksunten
lille
liguria
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
emilia-romagna
cyprus
croatia
calabria
bulgaria
brussels
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant
abruzzoThis site made manifest by dadaIMC software
Re: Re: 100,000+
Date Edited: 04 Feb 2007 10:00:22 PM
I have been at all the marches. There have never been 100,000 at any of them for the reasons cited in my post. The arithmetic is pretty simple and devastating to the inflated estimates. The biggest ones top out at about 50,000, which is quite a large crowd. The organizers then inflate the actual numbers ten times.
The arithmetic to determine how many people can march by any spot in three hours is very simple. To get 100,000 down a road in three hours is impossible, even at a sprint. When the Union Army marched down Pennsylvania Avenue at the end of the Civil War, it took them two twelve hour days to push 100,000 disciplined marchers past the White House.
This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.