Bill K's logic is typically faulty - in part because of the assumptions he makes.

He assumes we wanted BLIX to conduct any resumed inspections, and the proceeds to attack us because of the fact that Blix is ALSO not a scientist. But many of us who saw his (Blix) behavior during this entire Iraq crisis as inconsistent and timid and TOTALLY insufficient, suspected his motives - and his placement.

During the entire time Bush was executing his LONG-PLANNED (See PNAC) invasion and rape of Iraq, the highly credentialed Scott Ritter, former UN weapons inspector, was being flayed by operatives within this administration because HE had been saying publicly what needed to be said, which was in complete opposition with the position of the Bush administration. So he suffered from the cowardly character assasination the Bush administration and GOP engage in whenever they face opposition.

In short, many of us suspected Blix all along. We supported the resumption of UN inspections, (something else Bush LIED about when he said they were given the opportunity to go in but where forced out by Saddam. In fact, they were forced out because of the imminent bombing campaign) - but we did NOT necessarily support Blix.

That's a difference the propagandists don't mention - and hopes we don't notice.