This is such a load of conspiratorial crap. Isn't it just possible that getting rid of Saddam was actually a good thing? That Bush wanted to get rid of him no matter what, and that conveniently Iraq _did_ have an illicit WMD program? Have you read Hans Blix's reports? Have you seen how many things that he believed Iraq covered up and lied about?

By working under the assumption that anything and everything that Bush's government does is wrong, you do your own cause an extreme disservice. It is possible to do the right thing with the wrong motives. You will have so much more credibility if you search out the truth, instead of searching out only evidence against Bush.

Extreme right wing, biased journalism needs an answer. Extreme left wing, biased journalism is not it.