J. Baker (see comment below) resorts to the usual spook tactics himself, in resorting to personal slander and wild generalisiations. Simply saying that something is " pure nonesense" is not an argument, its just a stubborn repetition of an unsupported opinion. Baker's idea of an argument is to throw around words like "gibberish", and "bizarre speculations" as a substitute for facts and logical deconstruction.

Calling someone a spook and using that to try discredit the argument is circular reasoning at its worst.

"It's nonsense, which proves he's a spook. Aha! because we know he's a spook, that proves that its nonsense."

None of Baker's drivel adds a single fact or logical thread to the issue, its just bigoted ranting.

If Baker thinks thats a real plane, then he's been watching too many cartoons. Real planes don't melt away into nothing. They don't stay silhoetted in full sunlight. They dont grow strange pimples on their underbellies in mid flight. They don't slice into a building without making a hole and without breaking up.

Baker makes no attempt to address these problems, but seems to think that simply using the words "nonsense" and "spook" can substitute for facts or logical argument.

The same tired old linguistic tactics were used ad nauseum to try to advance the ludicrous idea that a hijacked 757 hit the pentagon. I suppose Baker believes that one too?

The same tired old verbal abuse tactics were used to try to discredit the arguments for demolition of the WTC towers. I suppose Baker believes the govt story on that one too?

Baker does this forum a dis-service by simply repeating unsupported , abusively worded conclusions, and throwing around personal slander, rather than engaging in the intelligent debate for which the forum is designed. He should go and work for FOX news where people can get away with that sort of thing.

If he can present facts or logical deconstructions, then he should do so - put up or shut up.