worcester
western mass
vermont
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
seattle
sarasota
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
dc
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
asheville
arkansas
arizona
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
toscana
torun
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
sardegna
russia
romania
roma
portugal
poland
piemonte
patras
paris/Île-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
nottingham imc
norway
northern england
nice
netherlands
napoli
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
london
lombardia
linksunten
lille
liguria
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
emilia-romagna
cyprus
croatia
calabria
bulgaria
brussels
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant
abruzzoThis site made manifest by dadaIMC software
Weak
Date Edited: 11 Oct 2004 02:08:34 PM
I encourage you to continue contributing to the Baltimore Indymedia site.
1. Health Care: It's as if you feel Bush's plan is OK, other than the timing. A Counter-argument could be that Bush's timing is merely one of political pragmatism. No mention of what a Wall Street Journal pundit, no less, called the sleeping issue: The failed prescription drug "benefit." It is so complex that even if it was a good benefit, senior citizens can hardly figure out how to sign up for the benefit. But we know it's not a good "benefit;" it's based on crony "free market" fundamentalism, and was sold to congress using low-ball cost estimates.
2. You sya, "What right do people who never saw military service have to be sending young people to war?"
In other words, you're effectively saying "What right does anyone who does not have a military record have being president?" I know some women who have not served in combat. They seem ruled out of seeking the presidnecy by your original, cogent arguments.
3. When Bush said to a joint session of Congress on September 21, 2001, "You're either with us or you are with the terroritst," he failed in his leadership, and made the world shudder. Second-guessing what Bush was thinking in that class room on September 11, 2001 doesn't pass the "so-what" test.
4. Try this for an argument that we rarely hear: Bush warns of radio active materials falling into terrorists hands, which could be used to make a dirty bomb. After the invasion of Iraq, the US secures the Ministry of Oil, but fails to secure Iraq's primary nuclear research facility at al-Tuwaitha*. The failure to secure this well-known site strongly suggests that "anti-terrorism" is not the primary rationale for invading Iraq.
* al-Tuwaitha was made famous in 1981 when a nulcear power reactor at that site was bombed by Israel. The US failure to secure al-Tuwaitha allowed near-by villagers entry. Some villagers emptied 55-gallon drums of their contents and used them for water. The villagers later displayed signs of radiation poisoning; however, details are scant due to a subsequent media black out enforced by US military forces.
Could critique more, but....
This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.