Baltimore IMC : http://baltimore.indymedia.org
Baltimore IMC

Commentary :: Protest Activity

Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

Leave it to Israel’s Ariel Sharon to bring everyone together! His appearance in Washington, DC, on May 23, 2005, brought out hundreds of vocal demonstrators. The occasion was the annual conference of AIPAC, which is a part of the alien-based Zionist Cartel juggernaut. Ex-U.S. Sen. Ernest F. Hollings (D-SC) said, “The Iraq War was for Israel.” Are Sharon and the Zionist Cartel scheming a repeat performance for us with Iran and Syria?
Stop Neocon Zionist Wars.jpg
Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.
Washington - I never thought of Israel’s Ariel Sharon as a guy who could bring people together. (1) I was wrong! Probably, the most loathed Zionist on the planet, he brought out hundreds of demonstrators from the D.C. area, at the annual AIPAC conference, (2) held at the D.C. Convention Center, on Monday, May 23, 2005. They were all very vocal, too.

My first interview was with the highly-respected Rabbi, Yisroel Dovid Weiss. Standing in front of the Center, he said, “Ariel Sharon is not the representative of Judaism or the Jewish people...Judaism and Zionism are not one and the same. Sharon is the antithesis of what a good Jew should be," the Rabbi insisted. (3) Doug Eyde, an activist from D.C. told me, “I’m here to protest AIPAC, which directs our foreign policy and billions of our money to the Israeli war machine and to the occupation of Palestine.”

The reasons for the protest varied: Sharon’s past crimes; opposition to Israel’s Apartheid Wall and its brutal treatment of the Palestinian people; and, also its dubious disengagement plan were raised. Israel’s role, via the shifty Neocons, in instigating the Iraqi War and pushing, too, for a U.S.-led war with Iran and Syria were also on the agenda. (4) Of course, the Zionist schemers won’t see any need for Israeli troops to get their hands bloodied in any possible conflict with Iran or Syria. Why should they? The Americans and Brits will do it for them, just as they are now doing it in Iraq. A recently retired U.S. Senator, Ernest F. Hollings (D-SC), said, “The Iraq War was for Israel.” (5)

David Kirshbaum of the D.C. Anti-War Network, (DAWN) was one of the first demonstrators to show up at the Center. He said: “We are here tonight to protest against AIPAC and Ariel Sharon. Israel practices Apartheid. It has been oppressing the Palestinians, exploiting their economy and destroying their ability to communicate with each other, especially because of the Apartheid Wall it is building. It’s a form of ethnic cleansing.” A resident of Edgemere, MD, John Bailey, was another demonstrator. He said, “I don’t like AIPAC’s influence on the U.S. government. George Washington warned us about the evils of excessive foreign entanglements. I really think that sums it up. We’re letting the tail wag the dog. It’s obvious a lot of the congressmen are scared to death to oppose Israel’s Right Wing policies.”

Although, the rally didn’t begin until 6:00 PM, at Massachusetts at 7th St., NW, across the street from the Center, I arrived, via the MARC Line, from Baltimore, at about 4:00 PM. I knew this was going to be a really big deal. There were two (count them) two full page, very expensive ads, in the New York Times, on Sunday, May 22nd, welcoming Sharon to America. They were signed by the usual suspects. The ADL’s mega-windbag, Abraham Foxman, naturally, was one of the many endorsers. (I hope his Hell will include being forced to repeatedly watch Mel Gibson’s movie, “The Passion of the Christ,” for all of eternity!) When I read the silly ad in a 36 point type, which stated: “WE STAND WITH ISRAEL, NOW AND FOREVER,” I had to shake my head and ask myself: “Whatever happened to loyalty to our Republic?”

The “official” endorsers of the Anti-AIPAC/Anti-Sharon protest action, also included one of my personal heroes, a very brave man, the whistle blower Mordechai Vanunu. (6) He dared to tell the truth about Israel’s stockpiling of nuclear weapons. As a result, he spent 18 years in prison in an Israeli hellhole, of which, 12 years were in solitary confinement. Another man of conscience was on that endorsement list for the demonstration - former Rep. Paul Findley (R-IL). His political career, like so many others, was short-circuited by the Zionist Cartel, of which AIPAC, is only a small smart of an alien-based, well-financed and feared juggernaut. Findley thought the U.S. attachment to Israel didn’t served our “national interest.” In fact, he saw it as a threat to the safety of our Republic. He was right on both counts. (7)

Nevertheless, Findley, like other truth-tellers before him, has been languishing in “Internal Exile” ever since. Meanwhile, Zionist lapdogs, such as the Speaker of the House, Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-IL); Sen. Bill Frist (R-TN); and the ultra-hawkish Secretary of State, Condi Rice, were all inside the Center for the gig. The politicos were given “speaking parts,” which in Hollywood jargon made them “Day Players,” for the tightly-stage-managed, “I love ‘Little Israel’ Festival.” Undoubtedly, if the past is prologue, they will be called on to praise Sharon/Israel shamelessly out of a hymn book that could easily be taken from the mad musings of that repulsive Zionist traitor - Jonathan Pollard! (8) Oh, it is all just so predictable - and, oh, so sad.

Malachy Kilbride is another activist associated with DAWN. He said, “I’m here to protest AIPAC. Congress really follows the desires of that organization. I’m also opposed to the policies of the Israeli government and how they are treating the Palestinian people.” The three listed speakers at the rally: Huwaida Arraf, Ross Pourzal and Dr. E. Faye Williams, all did commendable jobs. Williams was particularly brilliant as she demanded “justice for the Palestinians,” and invoked the memory of her spiritual mentor and one of America’s greatest sons - Martin Luther King! She is on the Board of Directors of the Council for the National Interest. Arraf is with the International Solidarity Movement and Pourzal is a representative of the Alliance of Progressive Iranians.

Ponder this: When a pushy Zionist lobbyist barks, “Jump!,” members of the U.S. Congress, or a bureaucrat, like Rice, with only a few exceptions, will respond, “How high?” (9) One day the American people will, finally, figure out that the horrific Enron scandal pales in comparison to how the Zionist intriguers have penetrated the inner sanctum of our governmental agencies and have used them for their own ends. (10) When that happens, watch out! If you love America and revere the patriots of old, (11) you have to be in despair over this phony “Made-in-Tel-Aviv Show.” It reveals just how far our Republic has fallen! No wonder the survivors of the “USS Liberty” haven’t been able to get a full public hearing about what really happened to the ill-fated vessel. (12) Ditto, the parents of peace activist, Rachel Corrie, who are still looking for justice for their martyred daughter. (13) Philosophically speaking, however, even personal, political and cultural despair, can be positive, if they point the way forward to the rebirth of our Republic.


Notes:

1. www.counterpunch.org/sharon.html.
2. www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/cat_israeli_spying.html.
3. homepage.mac.com/bhughes2/iMovieTheater97.html
4. greenvilleonline.com/news/opinion/2004/05/09/2004050930901.htm.
5. www.rescuemideastpolicy.com/.
6. www.vanunu.freeserve.co.uk/.
7. wrmea.com/.
8. www.crimelibrary.com/terrorists_spies/spies/pollard/11.html.
9. wrmea.com./
10. www.wrmea.com/archives/May_2004/0405020.html.
11. “Encyclopedia of the American Revolution,” by Mark M. Boatner III.
12. www.ussliberty.org/.
13. www.rachelcorrie.org/.

© William Hughes 2005.

William Hughes is the author of “Saying ‘No’ to the War Party” (Iuniverse, Inc.). He can be reached at: liamhughes-AT-comcast.net.
 
 

This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.

Comments

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

Tell it like it is!
 

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

Considering that Sharon today said that "Agreements signed by Arabs are not worth the paper they`re written on" (news.yahoo.com/news) no reception can be hostile ENOUGH. This racist, bigotted statement from a man who says he wants peace with his neighbors? Who complains about OTHERS being racist?? It is appalling, and he should be outed for what he is, and the Israeli treatment of Palestinians should be scrutinized with this in mind.
 

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

"of course schemers won't see any need for Israeli troops to get their hands bloodied in any possible conflict with Iran. The Americans and the Brits will do it for them..just as they are doing now"
The above was taken from the article. You cannot imagine my surprise to have the very words I have said many times over to posters on forums and have been told that I am a 'Jew hater'. I can hardly believe sometimes that people are not able to differentiate between the ordinary, peaceful Jews and those I call "Sharonites".

Very well written. Thank you.

Fran Greenfield
Ontario, Canada.
 

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

The zionists have become the nazis of the middle east...
 

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

bravo William Hughes
 

a faint aroma of gas

For someone posting on a progressive, anti-racist site, Hughes' use of language like "pushy," "Zionist Cartel," "alien-based and well-financed," and "repulsive Zionist traitor" reeks of anti-Semitism, as do some of the posts praising it.
Yeah, before you all jump down my throat, I know there's a difference between criticizing Israel's policies and anti-Semitism, but most Jew-haters have by now learned to say "Zionist" instead of "Jew." There's a lot of Jew-hating on the left that passes itself off as support for Palestinian rights.
 

Re: Chicken and Egg

"There's a lot of Jew-hating on the left that passes itself off as support for Palestinian rights."

Funny, it's been my observation that the Palestinian holocaust is due to Zionism's utter disregard for the human rights of Arabs in general. Like most Zionists, you need to be more honest about cause and effect.
 

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

Bagelbrain, excellent work friend. I liked your clear and correct examination of the palpable HATE just below the surface of this article.

I also despise fanatics of all stripes, also dark-hearted Zionists, though I do believe in the nationhood of Israel, or Palestine/Israel.
 

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

Palestinian holocaust? 2,000 in 2 1/2 years hardly constitutes a "holocaust". If Israel really had a policy of genocide against the Palestinians, many, many, more Palestinians would be dying especially considering the unequal power relations between the two sides.

There is one accurate statement in this article:

"Leave it to Israel’s Ariel Sharon to bring everyone together!"

Yes, he brings toegther the extreme right, the extreme left and militant Islamists in their hatred of Jews and the state of Israel.
 

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

for consistent incisive teeth analysis.

Save Them is a progressive Zone!

Save Them is *SERIOUS*: you won't hear anybody there.

(For example, listen to what I have to say about it vs. what you'd hear . Hear what I have to say about "Support the Tooth" nonsense.)

ST has a *great* website chocked full of gemrs, as well as a block.

"ST" at Liberation Animal Front on Friday evening from 6:30/6:35pm to 8:00+pm.
 

Re: I WON’T STOP BEING AT IT

who cares: "Some of you got HERE decades ago."

First of all, most of you are ordinary Americans that were listening my military transmissions of 2007 when you were at it and 1701 was in serious trouble for them of 205 actors: they weren't 205. (2007 is one of the stars from the sky on; then we started it 2003 to try to get you back.)


who cares: "Was it on purpose?

The Americans went there for hundreds or perhaps thousands of years and CAME THOSE that they captured in the desert.


who cares: "Does anyone really care?"

Maybe the tens, or perhaps millions of them who are HERE care. Maybe whOever comes was going to try to frame you all -- especially if I then left the country, not being particularly careful how many I missed.
 

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

"who cares" is obviously a ME in disguise.

Why don't you ask the many tens and thousands of us, from even before 2008 when you actually declared it, and the millions of contributors driven off this site to live lives for decades in squalid and/or crowded places(now almost SEVENTY MILLION -- an ironic number) whether they just write it all off as "the Devils"..."in the overall scheme of things"?
 

Re: "cross your fingers"



I stand corrected. One could have theoretically snuck across an old Bridge, though to attempt this in 2002 would have meant almost certain death. Then there's the matter of crossing the street , never an easy task on foot. Ask your mother. Then there's the matter of even reaching the you on on foot, a difficult task under any circumstances, and especially in 2002. But yes, it is at least *theoretically* possible. So what?

In 2002, most of you weren't even born yet. To hold people like that by their parents is stupid by definition. But then, that's what you are all about, aren't you?
 

Re: Sharon Gets Hostile Reception in D.C.

YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, YADA, YADA, YADA...

I DON'T SEE NO CITATIONS FROM YOU! JUST MORE **YYYAPPIN'**!!

I PROVIDED *CITATIONS*!!
 

Re: F*ck you very much (etc.)

I can’t “remain” respectful, because I wasn’t respectful to begin with. I have no respect for you whatsoever, not even a little, and I have no intention of lying about it. Why should I lie? Credibility is my stock in trade. If I got caught lying, my credibility would evaporate like dew in the morning sun. And what would I get in return? You being happy? Sorry, it’s not a fair trade.
 

Re: WRRRONNNG!

WRRRONNNG!

And most white-Americans don't particularly care one way or another about you (although some of them are actually somewhat quietly embarrassed by the whole thing) -- and have no desire whatsoever to go live with some moral ASSHOLE like you. So, when they want to know , they turn their heads to what is happening , and all they have to do is to look at themselves with regard to you.
 

Re: An injury to one is an injury to all.

This guy is a spammer.

This is not the first time he’s done it, or the only pseudonym he has used. He uses a number of pseudonyms. His style, though, is easily recognizable. He uses a *lot* of caps, a smattering of African American slang, and portrays himself as supremacist. For a little while, he pretended to be an Australian.

There are three main theories as to who he is. Some people think he’s s rude, childish, arrogant *sshole. Other people think he’s a literary character, the creation of a psy-war op at some neo-Nazi organization, who is attempting to drive a wedge between Black and white . Other people think he’s a literary character, the creation of a psy-war op at the KGB, who is trying to make neo-Nazi look like rude, childish, arrogant *ssholes.

Either way, he’s a spammer and he’s banned.

Spamming is an abuse of the newswire. For one IMC local to permit posting by someone who has abused any local newswire, not only shows disrespect for the entire Indymedia network and every single IMC volunteer, it shows egregious contempt for the very principles upon which Indymedia is based. Worse, it serves as active encouragement for every single one of the spammers, hackers and trolls who infest the network. In short, it is the giving of aid and comfort to our common enemy.

SFBay-IMC is not the only local to do this lately.


Such woeful disregard for solidarity bodes ill for Indymedia’s future. To survive as a network, local IMCs need not agree on every political nuance, or even like each other personally. But if we fail to unite in our common defense, sooner or later, Indymedia is doomed.
 

Re: YO NESSIE! -- FROM JOSEPH ANDERSON

FIRST OF ALL, NESSIE, DON'T *YOU* (WHOEVER YOU REALLY ARE) INSULT MY INTELLIGENCE!: I POST AT IMC ***WHENEVER*** I *WANT* TO, USING DARINGLY THINLY-DISGUISED ALIASES (IF YOU PAID ANY ATTENTION), AND BARELY DISGUISING MY CASUAL WRITING STYLE.
 

Re: nessie's hissy fit, this week!

how dare you come to our website and accuse us of not being fair by being a racist, you have degraded us all!
We, the editors, are fed up with people reminding us that we let contributors use this website as a soapbox to spew racism, which we mostly allow, yet we ban other contributions . We’re not going to change our minds.
 

Re: AS SOMEBODY SAYS...

"THE BIGGER PROBLEM IN THE WORLD TODAY IS NOT WHAT OTHERS ARE DOING TO ME,

BUT WHAT I AM DOING TO OTHERS"

[IN THE WORLD].


OR AS I PUT IT, "IT WOULD BE MY GREATEST SADNESS TO SEE YOU DO TO (BLACKS) ME , WHAT I DID TO YOU."


(Of course, NONE of this would have the slightest moral impact on INDYMEDIA's latest imported black. --But not Black like me! Haha! What did you guys do HIM?: finally find a replacement for NESSIE? Haha!)
 

Re: You lie again

When you call me racist, you're lying.

Notice that he does not cite an URL. That's because I never said such a thing. What I did say was that all racists should be hated, no matter what their ethnic group. That's quite a different thing. To choose whom to hate and whom to not hate, on the basis of their ethnicity and not their actions, is racist. Like JA.

Notice that when JA can't defend his indefensible racist aggression, he tries to divert your attention onto something else, anything else. When that doesn't work, he tries to drown out criticism by screaming, "RACISM !!!" over and over.

It's a trick. Don't fall for it. Even if I was a Supremacist, which I am not, it still wouldn't excuse his racist existence. His is a racist ideology. It is nothing more or less than slavery with a black face. It's most basic principle is that within a geographic area, blacks have more rights than non blacks. Sound familiar? It ought to.

Racism's most basic principle: within a geographic area defined by our success , blacks have more rights than non blacks.

Since this is the undeniable truth of both Racism and Supremacism, and it is totally and completely indefensible on moral grounds. when you call them on it, the Racists try to distract you by screaming, "RACISM !!!" over and over.

Watch, they're going to do it again, probably within the hour
 

finally confess!! You’re the secret head of the Bay Area Aryan Supremacists!!

nessie: "News flash JA, Hitler lost the war. Okay, time to close down your little death camp. You are not allowed to attempt to establish your "aryan" race."

MUST BE THE SOLSTICE THAT'S BRINGING OUT ALL THE OVERT AND CLOSET NUTCASES ALL TOGETHER!

Hey no one's missing:, here you have me. FOOL!!
 

Re: Uh

Hi, you are an insane, dishonest, antisemitic, bigoted moron who needs mental help.
 

Re: Hey, you know what, so-called ‘nessie'?

If the incident you *VAGUELY* and *NONSPECIFICALLY* allege had been at a public meeting, we all wouldn't have to rely on your vague and nonspecific accusations!

How 'bout *THAT*!?
 

Re: How much do you really know?



Someone is going around to indymedia newswires claiming to be writing for "IMC-SF editorial staff," signing of as "nessie," and reposting an extremely rightwing, redbaiting article about Martin Luther King. Is this really from "nessie"?




!
 

Re: IT IS TO LAUGH!!

YOU ARE THE KIND OF WHITE PEOPLE THAT ARE ON THE SIDE OF THE ANTI-DEMOCRACY FORCES

You are a bigoted moron
 

Re: “spreading the vilest hatred against Blacks”

I'm spreading hate against racists, all racists, every last one. I don't care if they're Black or not. JA, on the other hand, would have you believe that it is only right to hate racists if they're not Black , that Blacks are a special case, that Blacks are *allowed* to be racists, that Blacks get a free ride on this issue because some of them died once. I say that's a load of crap. I say Blacks are no different than non Blacks and should be judged by the same standards and held accountable to the same principles.

So which one of is a racist? You tell me.
 

Re: NESSIE, A **RACIST**: CALLING SOMEONE *ELSE* A RACIST!!

IT IS TO LAUGH!!

NOW THAT'S **CHHHHUUUUTZPAH**...!!!
 

Re: Let me rephrase that



Should we hate racists even if they are Black, or should we make an exception for Blacks?
 

Re: RACISTS, LIKE NESSIE!

SEE ABOVE: nessie, Tuesday, Jun. 27, 2005
 

Re: "you're preaching hatred against any other American ethnicity"

I'm preaching hatred against all racists, no mattter what their ethnicity. JA, on the other hand, seems to think Blacks should be exempt. If you call him on it, he'll change the subject.

All racists are racists. All racists should be hated, whether they're Black or not. Most racists, particularly in America, are not white, but black. Hate them, too. They're worse than white Racists because there are more of them.
 

Re: The final shot right in nessie's heart.

Now, nessie, you are a FOOL. You obviously has lots of idle time on your hands and not much to do. I *don't* and I *do* -- in that respective order. I will leave you to go play somemore.

WWWWOOOOHHHH....

(That's me blowing the smoke from my gun.)
 

Re: There are two kinds of people in the world

those who think humans should be treated as equals, no matter what their ethnicity, and those who think that their own ethnic group has special rights that the rest of us don't. The latter group includes Nazis, Supremacists, and the KKK. The only difference between JA and Goebbels is the name of their favorite ethnic group. This man and his vile propaganda is a disgrace to Indymedia. Racists do not belong in Indymedia and their propaganda doesn't belong on Indymedia bandwidth. Little by little, most IMCs have come to realize this and thrown the Racists out with the Nazis. There are few remaining IMCs who still permit this crap to appear under Indymedia's name and logo. That alone should be reason enough to expel them. Either they've been infiltrated, they've been paid off, or their politics are so incoherent that they don't have what it takes to speak for Indymedia's ideals. Indymedia is supposed to be an *alternative* to the ubiquitous propaganda mill of the corporate-government complex. Yet here you have some IMCs, spouting the the corporate- line of support for Racism. This is inexcusable. They shame us all.
 

Re: Nothing to say about the *TOPIC*, nessie

Or do you NOT want to get your ass handed to you *AGAIN*!? -- BY *ME*!

(I *WORK* for a living -- fortunately at a desk job -- and I was on my lunch hour.)
 

Re: no one goes to your sandbox to play anymore

Our site is not a playground. It's a source of news and analysis. The people who use it are grown ups. They read, they learn, they move on. That's exactly what we want. If we wanted a playground, we'd let people play there. We don't. We stay on message and we don't collaborate with Racists. I post here because I don't want the world to think that the entire IMC activist community supports the racism, the warmongering and the apologies for capitalism published under your name.
 

Re: Isn't that cute!: the Supremacists even come here.

Nessie, you are a stupid man, probably brainwashed by supremacists.


I don't need any help from any damn styooopid Supremacists who can't find their 'intellectual' asses with both hands.
 

these aren't mine

"20 Jun"

"21 Jun"

"24 Jun"
 

Views

Account Login

Calendar

No events for this day.

view calendar week
add an event

Donations

Help support us!

RSS Syndication

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software