Baltimore IMC : http://baltimore.indymedia.org
Baltimore IMC

LOCAL News :: Right Wing

43 Dems Voted For Pat Act - Did You Elect These SOBs

Please let them know how you feel!
Andrews
Baca
Barrow
Bean
Bishop (Ga)
Boren
Boswell
Butterfield
Cardin
Carnahan
Case
Chandler
Clyburn
Cooper
Cramer
Davis (Al)
Davis (Fl)
Davis (Tn)
Edwards
Emanual
Etheridge
Gordon
Green, Gene
Harman
Herseth
Higgins
Holden
Hoyer
Lipinski
Marshall
McIntyre
Melancon
Menendez
Miller (NC)
Ortiz
Pomeroy
Reyes
Ross
Ruppersberger
Schwartz (PA)
Scott (Ga)
Skelton
Spratt
 
 

This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.

Comments

Write Your Rep

 

Re: 43 Dems Voted For Pat Act - Did You Elect These SOBs

For anyone wondering, I have written Dutch Ruppersberger on most issues. I have learned that he does not represent the best interest of the people, the Bill of Rights, the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 and IS a Democrat in Name Only. He believes he should support Bush in everything he does and vote as the President wishes him to vote. He seems to have forgotten he is our check and balance and our representative. It is time for a change in 2008. Dutch Ruppersberger needs to be replaced. He does not represent his constituents, but represents the neo con agenda.

I learned a lot of harsh realities this past election. One of them was that you cannot believe someone is a "Democrat" just because they are running as a Democrat. Spread the word. Dutch Ruppersberger represents the interest of corporations, George W. Bush and the oligarchy our government has become. I plan to write an article. I have saved all of his correspondence and will post copies of his letters.

Beware Dutch Ruppersberger does not represent you. He Voted for the Bankruptcy bill, and against the people on EVERY single issue. He seems to be under the impression that people can pay their bills if a corporation has laid them off and there is no work. He was ABSENT on confiming the fraudulent vote for GW Bush as president. He DID vote against CAFTA, but only so it would not hurt "industry", NOT because he cared about anyone's jobs.

Let it be known. He needs to be replaced. LOSE Ruppersberger.
 

Re: 43 Dems Voted For Pat Act - Did You Elect These SOBs

For anyone wondering, I have written Dutch Ruppersberger on most issues. I have learned that he does not represent the best interest of the people, the Bill of Rights, the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 and IS a Democrat in Name Only. He believes he should support Bush in everything he does and vote as the President wishes him to vote. He seems to have forgotten he is our check and balance and our representative. It is time for a change in 2008. Dutch Ruppersberger needs to be replaced. He does not represent his constituents, but represents the neo con agenda.

I learned a lot of harsh realities this past election. One of them was that you cannot believe someone is a "Democrat" just because they are running as a Democrat. Spread the word. Dutch Ruppersberger represents the interest of corporations, George W. Bush and the oligarchy our government has become. I plan to write an article. I have saved all of his correspondence and will post copies of his letters.

Beware Dutch Ruppersberger does not represent you. He Voted for the Bankruptcy bill, and against the people on EVERY single issue. He seems to be under the impression that people can pay their bills if a corporation has laid them off and there is no work. He was ABSENT on confiming the fraudulent vote for GW Bush as president. He DID vote against CAFTA, but only so it would not hurt "industry", NOT because he cared about anyone's jobs.

Let it be known. He needs to be replaced. LOSE Ruppersberger.
 

Views

Account Login



Forgot your password?

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software