Baltimore IMC : http://baltimore.indymedia.org
Baltimore IMC

Commentary :: War in Iraq

Did the Bishops Make "A Devil's Pact" for Anti-Choice Judge?

During the very close 2004 presidential election, the Catholic Bishops did everything but officially endorse the ultra-War Hawk, George W. Bush, Jr. I suspect, but I can’t prove, that “a devil’s pact” was hatched between the clerics and the Bush-Cheney Gang. The clerics would push for Bush’s victory and he would oppose abortions and appoint an anti-choice judge to the Supreme Court at the first opportunity. Is John G. Roberts, Jr. that jurist?
Click on image for a larger version

RC Cathedral.jpg
“The Church in America is...in near perfect allegiance to the State!” - The late Phil Berrigan, Apostle of Peace and Dissenter Emeritus. (1)

The Catholic Bishops in America are on record as opposing the war in Iraq. (2) I’m sure it’s based on a beautifully written document that will make for a nice framing in an archive someday. The truth is that they have been mostly silent about the conflict, except for a little posturing here and there. They also oppose abortion. On the latter issue, however, their defiance is persistent, vigorous, with a take-no-prisoners attitude. Why haven’t they been just as strongly opposed to the immoral Iraqi war-a war which is incapable of being sustained on any legitimate theological basis? (Of course, this question can also be posed to the leaders of the other Christian and Jewish denominations, as well.)

I think I might have the answer, but it’s only speculation on my part. I suspect, but I can’t prove by any probative evidence, that the Catholic Bishops made a deal, an unholy bargain, with the Bush-Cheney Gang. My theory, and that is all it is, is that the Bishops promised to boost Bush’s presidential candidacy in the 2004 election, if he would continue to oppose abortion and if he would also promise to appoint an anti-choice judge to the Supreme Court at the next opening on that panel. Unfortunately, unless one of the principals to this nod-and-wink type of "a devil’s pact” owns up to it, we may never know the full truth! I can only say this for sure: If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and talks like a duck, then it is, most likely, a duck!

Here is some background: On Aug. 3, 2004, only months before the presidential general election, the Knights of Columbus, (K of C), a Roman Catholic organization, held its annual convention in Dallas, Texas. (3) Despite the fact it is supposed to be a nonpolitical group, the guest speaker was none other than President George W. Bush, Jr., a candidate for reelection, who is also anti-abortion. He was then in a very tight race with the Democratic nominee, John Kerry, who was pro-choice on the abortion question. Many of the leading Catholic Bishops and Cardinals throughout the country showed up in Dallas to “bless” Bush at that event. Some had even spoken out before the Convention about denying Holy Communion to Kerry because of his liberal position on abortion. Oh, by the way, Texas is also the home base of Bush’s chief of staff, and reputed brain, Karl Rove! Right after the K of C event, and only days before the Nov. 2nd election, on Oct. 21, 2004, another important political signal was sent to the Catholic community in America. Philadelphia's Cardinal Justin Rigali, a very influential prelate, met personally with Bush for a photo op in a church rectory, in Downingtown, PA. On Oct. 3, 2004, that same Cardinal Rigali had given a homily, which some observers read as a ringing endorsement of Bush’s candidacy. It was distributed to 1.5 million Catholics in the Philadelphia area. (4)

At that time, I remember raising this question: “Is the Church’s silence on the Iraqi War a quid pro quo with the Bush-Cheney Gang for its pushing the Vatican’s anti-abortion agenda?” At the K of C Convention, Bush announced to wild cheers from the gleeful prelates, that “religious organizations would receive part of $188 million in government grants this year for social service programs, the centerpiece of a White House ‘faith-based’ initiative.” (5)

Recently, my suspicions rose even higher about a possible deal, when President George W. Bush nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court, John G. Roberts, Jr. He’s a 50-year-old, Harvard-educated, Roman Catholic and corporate lawyer. In the early 90s, Roberts had served as a deputy solicitor general during the “Reign of Bush I.” He did participate in a legal brief during that period, in which he had argued that Roe v. Wade was “wrongfully decided and should be overruled.” (6) His wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, also a lawyer, serves on the board of Feminists for Life, a group committed to “ending abortion.” (7) Roberts could be one of the payoffs that I am surmising about. Of course, he personally had nothing to do with this supposed bargain, but he may, if he's approved by the U.S. Senate, get the benefit of it.

In the eyes of some Church leaders, abortion is the greatest evil in the world. They insist on saying things like this, even though half the people on the planet exist on less than $2 a day! (8) For example, in the country of Venezuela, 85 percent of its citizens barely survive, living in grinding poverty. For these people, and billions more like them, abortion is the last thing on their minds. Also, the robot-like moralizing by the clerics over abortion tends to desensitize many to the existential horrors that daily confront humanity. (9)

"Not a few of our more prominent Bishops have even waited upon the Presidency like court jesters..." - Phil Berrigan (1)

The Bishops have a moral obligation to oppose an unjust war. This requires them to look for guidance to the Church’s most impressive authority on the question - St. Thomas Aquinas - one of Italy’s most brilliant sons. He is one of the leading teachers of the R.C. Church.

Among Aquinas' learned writings is his treatise on the concept of a “Just War.” (10) He gave three reasons that must be present in order for a war to be classified “as just:” It must be lawfully authorized, the causes for it must be justified and rightful intentions are needed. Well, I’m no theologian, (although my Irish mother did want me to become a priest), but my reading of Aquinas leads me to conclude that the Iraqi War couldn’t pass muster on any one of these reasons. Why? First, this war is illegal! It wasn’t "authorized" by the proper party, the U.S. Congress, under Art. 1, Sec. 8 (11) of the U.S. Constitution. Only the Congress can declare war. Therefore, it was without authority to delegate that awesome power to the hawkish Bush. Second, the supposed "causes" for the war were all based on lies, deceptions and fraud! (11) And, third, the “intentions” of the Bush-Cheney Gang in launching the Iraqi War weren’t by any stretch of the imagination “good.” In fact, they were all evil! Destroy Iraq; steal its oil; destabilize it and the region; plant military bases, occupy and impose a puppet regime to rule over it, were just some the real "intentions" of the warmaking cabal. (12) That cabal was led by Bush, V. P. Dick Cheney, and Paul Wolfowitz, the chief architect of the Iraqi War. (13)

As I write 1,781 Americans have died in the Iraqi War, over 15,000 have been wounded, and at least 26,000 innocent Iraqis are dead. A devastated Iraq has now become a major recruiting ground for militants, thanks, mostly to the gross recklessness of Bush, the UK’s Tony Blair and those slippery Neocons. (14) U.S. taxpayers have already wasted $183 billion on this conflict with no end in sight. The Republic’s future, too, is at risk because of all the rampant warmongering. (15) So, if the Bishops did make a pact with the Bush-Cheney Gang that bought their silence on the war, my question to the clerics would be this: “Are you happy, now?”

Finally, I suppose we will never really know the truth about whether there was a deal cut or not, unless, of course, the Machiavellian Rove-Bush's brain-is indicted and convicted of perjury in the ongoing Valerie Plame scandal and then decides to come clean in a sensational new book. If he does, the title of his tome might read like this: “Prison Memoirs of the Man Who was Bush’s Brain: How I got the Supposed Peace-loving Catholic Bishops to support in the 2004 presidential election my Warmongering Boss, Bush II.”

Notes:

1. Phil Berrigan in a letter to Bishop William Baum of Washington, Sept., 1971, at: www.thesocialedge.com/archives/tedschmidt/columns-dec2002.htm/. Check out also for background on Berrigan, a video, March 19, 2002, at: homepage.mac.com/bhughes2/iMovieTheater22.html/ of his last public appearance, where he warned, "The Times are Ominous!" See, too, a short film on Berrigan's Funeral Procession, Dec. 9, 2002, at: homepage.mac.com/bhughes2/iMovieTheater74.html/
2. www.usccb.org/
3. As of Aug. 3, 2004, the date of the K of C Convention, when the R.C. clerics were catering to the warmongering Bush, the Iraqi conflict had already cost the lives of 13,398 Iraqi civilians, 925 brave American soldiers and wounded 5,976 more. The war had also extracted $126 billion out of our national treasury. See, antiwar.com/
4. Washington Times, “Bush Pitches for Catholic Vote,” Joseph Curl, 10/22/04.
5. Elisabeth Bumiller, 08/04/04, New York Times.
6. “Abortion Stance Becomes Subject of Speculation,” by Stephanie Desmon, Baltimore Sun, July 22, 2005.
7. “Anti-Abortion Advocacy of Wife of Court Nominee Draws Interest,” by Lynette Clemetson and Robin Toner, NYT, July 22, 2005.
8. worldrevolution.org/
9. www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/develop/2005/0112stateoftheworld.htm/
10. faculty.cua.edu/pennington/Law111/AquinasJustWar.htm/
11. www.afterdowningstreet.org/
12. www.thefourreasons.org/
13. www.unknownnews.net/031102a-be.html/
14. batr.net/neoconwatch/
15. “The Sorrows of Empire,” by Chalmers Johnson.

© William Hughes 2005

William Hughes is the author of “Saying ‘No’ to the War Party” (IUniverse, Inc.). He can be reached at liamhughes-AT-comcast.net.
 
 

This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.

Comments

Re: Did the Bishops Make "A Devil's Pact" for Anti-Choice Judge?

---First, this war is illegal! It wasn’t "authorized" by the proper party, the U.S. Congress, under Art. 1, Sec. 8 (11) of the U.S. Constitution. Only the Congress can declare war.---
Umm...it was authorized by Congress, though Congress did not literally declare "war."
usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa101102a.htm
 

Re: Did the Bishops Make "A Devil's Pact" for Anti-Choice Judge?

The war was authorized by Congress. See link:
usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa101102a.htm
 

Re: Did the Bishops Make "A Devil's Pact" for Anti-Choice Judge?

On 9-11 I was in a hospital waiting for a procedure to be done. I was in the waiting room along with 20 other people. The TV was on and the news interruption came on about the plane that had hit the first tower. People in the waiting area began talking about the "idiot-blind-pilot" who hit the tower. I interrupted them and said "Excuse me. This is a terrorist attack. They have been claiming they would do this ever since the failed attempt in 1993." They all looked at me like I was an idiot, and several of them "poo-pooed" my statement. One guy mumbled under his breath "conspiracy theorist." As those words left his lips the second plane hit, and everyone gasped in horror. I then said "I rest my case."

My point being that it never ceases to amaze me how people miss the *obvious* truth of a situation, which is *always* easy to see. The truth of the Roberts nomination *is*:

Last year the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush Administration's Guantanamo Gulag policies. George W. Bush is a mean vicious person who needs revenge (which is what "getting Saddam" was all about as far as *he* was concerned).

A week before Roberts was nominated he ruled in favor of Bush's "Enemy Combatant Detainee" policies. The "pact" has nothing to do with abortion and everything to do with the Supreme Court turning the tables on itself in favor of Bush's "Enemy Combatant Detainee" policies.

For Bush this all about "revenge" for the Superior Court ruling against him.

In the mean time he's got everyone clamoring over the "abortion issue."

When I think of 9-11 I think of those clueless people sitting around the TV taking about the "idiot drunken pilot" who flew into the tower. And when I think of the Roberts nomination I think of all the clueless people bantering on about "abortion."

The real "pact" has nothing to do with "Abortion" and everything to do with "Enemy Combatants, Detainees and Civil Rights."
 

Re: Did the Bishops Make "A Devil's Pact" for Anti-Choice Judge?

On 9-11 I was in a hospital waiting for a procedure to be done. I was in the waiting room along with 20 other people. The TV was on and the news interruption came on about the plane that had hit the first tower. People in the waiting area began talking about the "idiot-blind-pilot" who hit the tower. I interrupted them and said "Excuse me. This is a terrorist attack. They have been claiming they would do this ever since the failed attempt in 1993." They all looked at me like I was an idiot, and several of them "poo-pooed" my statement. One guy mumbled under his breath "conspiracy theorist." As those words left his lips the second plane hit, and everyone gasped in horror. I then said "I rest my case."

My point being that it never ceases to amaze me how people miss the *obvious* truth of a situation, which is *always* easy to see. The truth of the Roberts nomination *is*:

Last year the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush Administration's Guantanamo Gulag policies. George W. Bush is a mean vicious person who needs revenge (which is what "getting Saddam" was all about as far as *he* was concerned).

A week before Roberts was nominated he ruled in favor of Bush's "Enemy Combatant Detainee" policies. The "pact" has nothing to do with abortion and everything to do with the Supreme Court turning the tables on itself in favor of Bush's "Enemy Combatant Detainee" policies.

For Bush this all about "revenge" for the Superior Court ruling against him.

In the mean time he's got everyone clamoring over the "abortion issue."

When I think of 9-11 I think of those clueless people sitting around the TV taking about the "idiot drunken pilot" who flew into the tower. And when I think of the Roberts nomination I think of all the clueless people bantering on about "abortion."

The real "pact" has nothing to do with "Abortion" and everything to do with "Enemy Combatants, Detainees and Civil Rights."
 

rope a pope

From: “The Messianic Legacy” by Lincoln Leigh Baigent

Chapter 24 “Secret Powers Behind Covert Groups”

page 347 Subtitled “Moves By The CIA”

The man perhaps most responsible for initiating interest in United Europe Movements was Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, who had founded Pan-Europa in 1922 as The Pan European Union. Although it accomplished little on a practical level, Pan-Europa, in the period between the wars, was a prestigious organization. Its membership included a number of esteemed political figures, such as Leon Blum and Aristide Briand in France and Eduard Benes in Czechosolvakia, as well as Winston Churchill. The membership also included Albert Einstein, and such cultural luminaries as Paul Valery, Miguel de Unamuno, George Bernard Shaw and Thomas Mann.
Driven out of Austria by the German Anschluss of 1938, Coudenhove-Kalergi, in 1940, fled to the United States. Here he lobbied tirelessly for his Pan-European ideal, insisting that European unity must be a priority for American Policy after the war. His efforts served to convince a number of important American political figures, such as William Bullitt and Senators Fullbright and Wheeler. When America entered the war, some of Coudenhove-Kalergi’s thinking offered a blueprint for action. It was to be adopted as such by the OSS, precursor of the CIA.
The OSS, or Office of Strategic Services, was created in emulation, and with the aid of, Britains MI6 and SOE. Its first director was General William (Wild Bill) Donovan. Donovans agents were to provide the nucleus for the post war CIA. One of them, Allen Dulles, became director of the CIA from 1953 until the Bay of Pigs debacle forced him to resign in 1961. During the war, Dulles had been based in Switzerland, and he maintained the contacts he had made there with Helmut James von Moltke and the Kreisau Circle.
As director of the OSS, William Donovan was quick to realize the potential significance of the Vatican to intelligence operations. Thousands of Catholic priests were also serving as chaplains in the armed forces of every combatant nation. The network was already engaged in intelligence activity, passing vast qualtities of information back to the Vatican’s own internal intelligences department. One of the four section leaders of Vatican Intelligence was Monsignor Giovanni Montini--later Pope Paul VI. Donovan therefore undertook to establish close links with the Vatican.
Shortly after Americas entry into the war, Donovan forged an alliance with one Father Felix Morlion, founder of a European intelligence service called Pro Deo (For God), based in Lisbon. Under Donovan’s auspices, Pro Deo moved its headquarters to New York, and the OSS undertook to finance its operation. When Rome was liberated in 1944, Donovan and Father Morlion proceeded to install Pro Deo in the Vatican itself. Here, it was particularly well situated to draw on information from Catholic priests who had been, or were still, in Germany or with German Armed Forces. The Jesuits, with their sophisticated training, rigorous discipline and tight knit organization, proved an especially valuable source of intelligence material.
In the period following the war, the United States hastened to capitalize on the apparatus Donovan had established, particularly in Italy. in 1948, with Italian elections scheduled, the newly formed CIA embarked on a complex clandestine operation to preclude any prospects of a communist victory. Under the auspices of James Angleton, Former OSS station chief in Rome, and later CIA head of counter-intelligence, millions of dollars were covertly filtered to the Christian Democrats, while additional funds were pumped into newspapers and other vehicles of propaganda. This procedure was also used to good effect in France.
As stated (Earlier in chapter than is covered here), Dr. Joseph Retingers trip to the United States on behalf of the European Movement led, on March 29 1949, to the creation of the American Committee on a United Europe, or ACUE. Its chairman was William Donovan. Its vice chairman was the former OSS head of Station in Switzerland, Allen Dulles. Its secretary was George S. Franklin, who was also director of the private council on Foreign Relations and subsequently became a co-ordinator of the Trilateral Commission. The executive director of ACUE was a serving CIA operative, Thomas Braden, then chief of the Agency’s International Organizations Department. Under the auspices of these men, ACUE decided to underwrite the European Movement of Joseph Retinger. Funds from American State Department sources were discreetly filtered to the European Movements Brussels headquarters. As the Soviet Union extended its influence across Eastern Europe, the epoch of the ‘Cold War’ began. Conceived originally to foster European Unity, the European Movement was gradually being conscripted to help build a ‘bulwark against communism’--and this bulwark conduced to the atmosphere in which clandestine organizations flourished.
Now partially financed by the CIA, Joseph Retinger and other members of the European Movement forged ties with Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, with the Italian Prime Minister and with Sir Colin Gubbins, former director of Britains SOE. Together with the then director of the CIA, General Walter Bedell Smith, this group proceeded to create a think tank which met for the first time in May 1954 at the Hotel de Bilderberg, in the Dutch town of Oosterbeek. Thus arose the Bilderberg Conferences.
In the meantime, the CIA had been proceeding on its own initiative as well, embarking on a large-scale program of covert action to support any institutions that might help consolidate the ‘bulwark against communism’. Political leaders, political parties and pressure groups, unions, newspapers and publishers were all heavily subsidised, providing their orientation was sufficiently pro-western and anti-communist. During the 1950’s, an average of between twenty and thirty million dollars a year was reportedly spent in Italy to support cultural activities, youth schemes, publishing ventures, and Catholic groups of one kind or another. Enterprises sponsored by the church, including missions and orphanges, were often co-funded by the CIA. CIA money was dispensed to many bishops and monsignors, one of whom was the future Pope Paul VI. And needless to say, The Christian Democratic Party in Italy remained a particuilart focus of attention. In fact the future Popes father, Georgio Montini, was co-founder in 1919 of the party which became the the Christian Democratic Party, and his elder brother was a Christian Democrat Senator.
Dr. Joseph Retingers CIA-sponsored European Movement was also active in Italy, further consolidating the bonds between the American Intelligence agency and the Vatican. Retinger enlisted the support of Dr. Luigi Gedda, an old personal friend, who was medical advisor to Pope Pius XII and also head of Azione Cattolica, or Catholic Action, the power behind the Christian Democratic Party. Through Gedda, Retinger was also able to conscript the services of the future Pope Paul VI, and Catholic Action became another primary recipient of CIA funds.
The rapport between the CIA and the Vatican became closer in 1963, when Pope John XXIII died and was succeeded by Paul VI, formerly Giovanni Montini, Archbishop of Milan. As we have noted, Montini was already associated with the agency and had already received funds from it. Even during the war, he had worked with the American intelligence services, passing information to and fro between the Vatican and the OSS. After the war, as Archbishop of Milan, he turned over to the CIA comprehensive dossiers on politically active priests. These were to be used to influence the Italian elections of 1960.
The relationship between the Vatican and the CIA has continued to the present. According to Gordon Thomas and Max Gordon-Witts, there occurred, in November 1978, a private meeting between Pope John Paul II and the CIA’s station chief for Rome. As a result of this meeting, an accord was reached whereby the Pope was to receive regular weekly intelligence briefings from the CIA. What the CIA received in return was not specified, but one can make an educated guess.
Another of the CIA’s most influential allies within the church was Cardinal Francis Spellman of New York. In 1954, he acted directly for the CIA in Guatemala, helping to stage a coup there which was orchestrated by the agency. But Spellman was also deeply involved in affairs in Italy. He played a crucial role in obtaining large sums of US Government ‘Black Money’ for the use of the Catholic Church. He was intimately associated with Bernardino Nogara, the mastermind behind the Vatican Bank, and with Count Enrico Galeazzi, who with Michele Sindona watched over Vatican investments and banking in the early 1960’s. And it was Cardinal Spellman who, in 1963, first brought to the Pope’s attention Father Paul Marcinkus of Chicago. By 1971, Marcinkus, now Archbishop, was head of the Vatican bank, a close friend of P2 members such as Michele Sindona and Roberto Calvi, and an alleged member of P2 himself.
The origins of the Masonic Lodge P2 are obscure, but it is believed to have been formed in the early 1960’s (Probably much earlier--ours). Whatever its original priorities and objectives may have been, its ultra right wing grand master, Licio Gelli, had soon brought it into the phalanx of groups and organizations which constituted the ‘bulwark against communism’. Certain of its members received generous CIA subsidies. And through individuals such as Calvi and Sindona, P2 provided a means of furnishing anti-communist institutions in Europe and Latin America with both Vatican and CIA funds. Calvi also claimed that he personally had arranged the transfer of 20,000,000.00$ of Vatican money to Solidarity in Poland, although the overall total sent to Solidarity is believed to be in excess of 100,000,000.00$. Prior to his indictment for murder, Michele Sindona was not only P2’s financier, but the Vaticans investment counsellor as well, helping the Church to sell its Italian assetts and re-invest in the United States. His services for the CIA including passing funds to ‘friends’ in Yugoslavia, as well as to the Greek Colonels prior to their seizure of power in 1967. He also channelled millions of dollars into the funds of the Christian Democrats in Italy.
When the existence of P2 first made international headlines in 1981, the scandal surrounding its stranglehold on the upper echelons of government, police, and finance was focused primarily on Italy. According to David Yallop, however:
...there are still branches functioning in Argentina, Venezuela, Paraguay, Bolivia, France, Portugal, and Nicaragua. Members are also active in Switzerland and the USA. P2 interlocks with the Mafia in Italy, Cuba, and the USA. It interlocks with a number of military regimes of Latin America, and with a variety of groups of neo-fascists. It also interlocks very closely with the CIA. It reaches right into the heart of the Vatican. The central common interest of all these elements is apparently the hatred and fear of communism...

It is now generally acknowledged that P2, however influential and powerful it may have been (!) Was, (And probably still is)controlled by some even higher, more shadowy authority, which transmitted its instructions through Licio Gelli, The Lodges Grand Master. According to an Italian parliamentary commission, the organization behind P2 lay ‘beyond the frontiers of italy’. There has been much speculation, both plausible and otherwise, about this organization. Some have identified it as the American Mafia. Some have suggested the KGB, or some other intelligence agency from Eastern Europe. Some have even suggested the Prieure de Sion. In 1979, however, a defector from P2 -- a journalist named Mino Pecorelli -- accused the CIA. Two months after this accusation, Pecorelli was murdered.
In March 1981 Italian Police raided Licio Gelli’s villa. they discovered comprehensive lists of the Lodge’s membership. They also discovered an index to Licio Gelli’s files -- although the files themselves had vanished, apparently being of greater importance than the membership lists. Some of the headings in the index were published in Italian newspapers. They included Opus Dei. They included Giulio Andreotti, currently Italian Foreign Minister and alleged, in a document we received, to be a member of Prieure de Sion. And they included the organization known officially as the soverign and Military Order Of The Temple Of Jerusalem -- the organization, that is, which today claims a direct lineal descent from the Knights Templar.
 

Re: Did the Bishops Make

If Ronald Regan or George W. Bush had been at Munich in September 1930, instead of Nevil Chamberalin and Dalier, there never would have been a WWII, and 60 million people would have lived.
 

Views

Account Login

Calendar

Today's Events

Kari Lydersen // Revolt On Goose Island: The Chicago Factory Takeover and What it Means in the Economic Crisis

Time: 7:00 PM

view calendar week
add an event

Donations

Help support us!

RSS Syndication

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software