Baltimore IMC : http://baltimore.indymedia.org
Baltimore IMC

LOCAL Commentary :: Elections & Legislation

Green’s Ed Boyd Challenges Duopoly in Maryland

It was business as usual for the ruling Duopoly-the Democrat/Republic Parties-on Oct. 14, 2006. Instead of have a three-way debate for governor of Maryland, Maryland Public Television, (MPT), excluded the Green Party’s Ed Boyd. Mr. Boyd said: “This sad situation is the best democracy that ‘money can buy.’ All the folks on the ballot aren’t being heard.” It makes me wonder: What does the word “public” in Maryland Public Television really stand for?
Click on image for a larger version

Green Party's Ed Boyd.jpg
“The Republican and Democratic Parties...morph into one corporate party with two heads.” - Ralph Nader

Owings Mills, Maryland - The Maryland Public Television (MPT) station, one of the largest in the state, decided to hold a debate on Oct. 14, 2006, between the candidates running for the office of governor. The general election will be held on November 7th. MPT invited only the incumbent, Robert Ehrlich, a Republican, who has close ties to George Bush’s White House; and one of his opponents, Baltimore's Mayor Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, who comes off as a Rudy Giuliani wannabe. These two politicos, a Duopoly, are much alike in so many ways. They are rolling in cash from campaign donations, now estimated to be in the mega millions of dollars. Most of the money comes from the special interests, who regularly dominate the General Assembly of Maryland. The station, MPT, however, deliberately decided to exclude the Green Party’s nominee for governor, Ed Boyd. In doing so, they are overlooking the fact that, in this contest between the candidates of the Duopoly, it is Boyd who truly represents the voice of the people, rather than that of the powerful special interests. Boyd has refused to take any corporate donations. (1)

The unfair decision by the honchos from the MPT did not sit well with Mr. Boyd, an African-American and U.S. Navy veteran, nor with his feisty supporters. They showed up, an hour before the 7 PM show time at the station located in a suburb of Baltimore City, only a few miles west of the Interstate Beltway, I-695, to protest the MPT’s biased decree. Although the Green Party enthusiasts were outnumbered at the scene by cheerleaders for Ehrlich and O’Malley, they made up for it with an abundance of spirit. One Robert J. Shuman is the chief executive officer of the MPT.

Mr. Boyd told me: “This sad situation is the best democracy that money can buy. There is sort of a pseudo gubernatorial debate going on tonight. The unfortunate thing is that all of the voices of Maryland will not be heard. You’ll hear voices from the Democratic Party--the Republican Party, but you will not hear voices, or from a representative for folks, who are independent, or from a Third Party candidate. Folks who have no desire to vote for either one of the [Establishment] candidates, their voices will not be heard [tonight]. Why? Because the person they want to represent them-Ed Boyd-myself, will not be allowed in the MPT for this debate.” Boyd’s ticket mate, who’s running for the office of Lt. Governor, is James Madigan, from Baltimore City. (2)

In Maryland, around 19 percent of the electorate, about 500,000 voters are registered as neither Democrat nor Republican. They come in under different political banners, like: Independent, Populist, Libertarian or Green. At the moment, another nominee of the Green Party, Kevin Zeese is making a very solid bid for a seat in the U.S. Senate from Maryland. He is campaigning as an Independent. To date, Zeese has participated in one three-way debate with his two opponents. This was a first for the state. It was held in Baltimore on Oct. 3, 2006, at the historic Orchard St. Church. I was at that event. I thought Zeese won it and gained a lot of public exposure for his showing. (3) Question: Is this one of the reasons that the Erhlich-O’Malley camps were afraid to include Boyd in tonight’s gubernatorial debate?

Ms. Brandy Baker, who is a Green Party candidate for the House of Delegates in Maryland’s sprawling 43rd district, was also at the protest action carrying a sign for Boyd. She said: “This is a three-way race [for governor] and not a two-way race, like the corporate media is making it out to be. I’m here to show my support and solidarity for Ed Boyd, and to also show my anger and outrage at his exclusion from this debate.” Ms. Baker informed me of the repeated efforts that were made to get Boyd included in the affair. She said that Alice Cherbonnier, the editor of the Baltimore Chronicle, a popular online journal, “challenged O’Malley and Ehrlich” to make it a three-way debate, but got the run around from them and from the television stations and networks. Ms. Baker added: “We’ve been blocked out.” She also said that the number one issue in her campaign (and Boyd’s too) is that the people are concerned about the “deregulation of the gas and electric industry in the state by the General Assembly” and the impact that it will have on them. She pointed the finger at two of her opponents, the incumbent delegates, Maggie McIntosh and Ann Marie Doory, who both “voted for” the measure. She said that McIntosh and Doory have also accepted campaign contributions from BG&E/Constellation Energy. Ms. Baker believes the draconian energy rate hikes, possibly as high as 74 percent, have “only been delayed until these Democrats get reelected.” (4)

“The MPT never gave us a reason for anything. They totally ignored us,” Myles Hoenig, the campaign manager for Boyd’s gubernatorial bid told me at the protest. “You have two corporate candidates [O’Malley and Ehrlich] inside [the MPT station], so you are only going to hear one side of the issue, the Republican/ Democrat side.” He said that O’Malley and Ehrlich are “both complicit” on the issue of BGE and the unjust gas and electric rate hikes. Mr. Hoenig added, they are so identical...like two peas in a pod...two evil twins separated at birth.” Hoenig praised the Baltimore Examiner and the Baltimore City Paper for their coverage of the Green Party and their candidates for office. (5)

I also talked with Ms. Maria Allwine, a Green Party activist at the protest action. She’s running for the State Senate on the Green Party ticket in Maryland’s 43rd district. Ms. Allwine said: “It’s truly an affront to the voters of Maryland to not include Ed Boyd in the debate. The Green Party is a legitimate Third Party in this state. Our registration numbers are growing. We have ballot access. Why not include Ed Boyd?” She blamed O’Malley for Boyd’s exclusion. Allwine added: “It’s because Mr. O’Malley doesn’t want to hear what Ed Boyd has to say. It’s going to make O’Malley look like the conservative that he really is. There are serious issues in the City of Baltimore that O’Malley doesn’t want to talk about.” (6)

Getting back to gubernatorial candidate Ed Boyd. He said that O’Malley and Ehrlich have taken an estimated “$150,000” in campaign contributions from BGE/Constellation Energy. He added, “They have refused to even attempt to give it back.” Mr. Boyd was very disappointed that Maryland, which holds itself out as a “progressive state,” isn’t allowing all the voices, all the choices...all the folks who are on the ballot” to be heard. (2) All of this makes me wonder: What does the word “public” in Maryland Public Television really stand for?

Finally, my hat goes off to Boyd, Baker, Hoenig, Allwine, Zeese, et al, and to all the Green Party’s energetic activists and progressive candidates in the state of Maryland, for taking on the arrogant Duopoly in this election year 2006. They are performing a truly valuable public service. Up the Green Party!

Notes:

1. www.edboydforgovernor.org/abouted.html
2. Ed Boyd’s comments can be viewed here:
www.youtube.com/watch
3. baltimore.indymedia.org/newswire/display/13790/index.php
4. Ms. Brandy Baker’s comments can be viewed here:
www.youtube.com/watch
Also see, baltimore.indymedia.org/newswire/display/12258/index.php
5. Myles Hoenig’s comments can be viewed here:
www.youtube.com/watch
6. Ms. Maria Allwine’s comments can be viewed here:
www.youtube.com/watch

© William Hughes 2006.

William Hughes is the author of “Saying ‘No’ to the War Party” (IUniverse, Inc.). He can be reached at liamhughes-AT-comcast.net.
 
 

This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.

Comments

Re: Green’s Ed Boyd Challenges Duopoly in Maryland

For an indymedia article, this piece is amazing in its bias. There are not three candidates on the Maryland ballot for governor in 2006; there are four candidates for governor. Christopher Driscoll is the Populist Party's candidate for governor and Ed Rothstein is the Populist's Party candidate for lt. governor and they are both on the ballot. MPT did not just exclude Ed Boyd from the debate; it also excluded Chris Driscoll from the debate.

Why would this article be calling for a three way debate when there are four candidates for governor? This article should be calling for a four way debate of all the candidates for governor who are on the Maryland ballot. Why would the Green Party candidate, Ed Boyd, treat another third party candidate the way the Democrats and Republicans treat him? He should be calling for debates that include all candidates on the ballot, which is exactly what Chris Driscoll has done. Mr. Driscoll wrote an open letter to the O'Malley, Ehrlich and Boyd campaigns on Sept. 28 urging open, public debates that include all four candidates. Not surprisingly O'Malley and Ehrlich didn't answer the letter, but surprisingly Boyd also didn't answer the letter.

This article should have also included a quote from Chris Driscoll, Ed Rothstein and other Populists, not just Brandy Baker and Maria Allwine, who spoke as if the Populist candidates don't exist. That kind of sectarianism is counter productive to the entire third party movement.

Chris Driscoll also "truly represents the voice of the people, rather than that of the powerful special interests." He also has refused to take any corporate donations. Why is he excluded from this article?

Like Chris Driscoll, I have called for inclusive debates. The Examiner published my letter to the editor on Oct. 10 in which I urged that paper to call for open debates that include all candidates who are on the ballot. I wrote "I'm sure the public wants to hear the views of Driscoll and Boyd just as much as they want to hear the positions of Ehrlich and O'Malley." I did not call for a debate including only Chris Driscoll with O'Malley and Ehrlich. I called for debates that include Ed Boyd, as well as Chris Driscoll, with the two corporate candidates, which is exactly what Ed Boyd and his campaign advisers should be doing.

Kevin Zeese is not just the candidate of the Green Party for the U.S. Senate. He is the candidate of the Populist and Libertarian parties also and is running as the unity candidate of all three parties. We certainly need more unity in the third party movement, not more division. This article does not promote unity.
 

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Green’s Ed Boyd Challenges Duopoly in Maryland

the Greens are running great campaigns and are nationwide, they are the third party that broke out, so we should be going with them. And party is going to be flawed.
 

Re: Be the Media

In addition, there is nothing from stopping K. Dellinger from posting a newswire article about the Populist Party and their candidates. Elections are on Nov. 7, 2006. I'm sure most do not know much about them.

That is why Indymedia's slogan is Be the Media, not just read the media.
 

Re: Green’s Ed Boyd Challenges Duopoly in Maryland

William Hughes Replies:

I expected that I might get whacked by Marty O’Mayor, Robert “Bobcat” Ehrlich, or one of their operatives for this piece, but not ever Kay Dellinger! Her critique of my article, which was datelined Owings Mills, MD, is literally off-the-mark. It’s downright silly to argue that, as a reporter, I should have called other Third Party candidates, who were “no shows” at the protest action to interview them. It is even sillier to suggest that I have a “bias” against these no-shows. In order to get pr. for a candidate, or a Party, the candidate and/or his supporters, have to “show up” at the event! They can’t phone it in! That doesn’t work.
The Green Party’s Ed Boyd knows how to get pr. for his campaign, which is a reflection of his hard work, and the creative efforts of his campaign manager, Myles Hoenig. When I arrived at MPT, Boyd was being interviewed by a reporter for the Baltimore Examiner. Then, when I had finished talking with him, a reporter for WBAL-TV began chatting, on camera, with him. Boyd is very good on the issues. He’s energetic and personable, and the local media genuinely likes him. Brandy Baker and Maria Allwine, both very articulate and also candidates for public office, were interviewed by me, along with Hoenig and Boyd. Why? Because they were at the site of the protest action, Owings Mills. They were also all carrying “Boyd for Governor” signs. My article was about a particular protest action, on a particular night, and at a specific site. It wasn’t an essay on Third Party candidates in Maryland and to imply otherwise is misleading to say the least. The MPT debate controversy at Owings Mills, MD, was the context of my piece.
Dellinger took a very successful protest action against the Duopoly and has, unfortunately, attempted to use it to divide, rather than bring people together. What the Green Party activists did at Owings Mills furthered the cause of Third Party politics and all Third Parties. It was a classic model of activism for others to follow in the future. Even though they were few in number at the MPT, the Green activists got terrific pr. mileage out of their efforts. I applaud them. I applaud, too, all the members of the Green Party, who have labored over the years to put the Party on the map. They are succeeding in election year 2006. It is Boyd, Hoenig, Baker, Allwine, et al, who are presently leading the way forward.
Bottom Line: If you want pr. for your candidate, or Party, then begin to “show up” at political protests, like the Owings Mills affair.
P.S. My taped interviews with Boyd, Baker, Allwine and Hoenig can be found at: www.youtube.com/profile
and on Google. In addition, a 30 minute video of the protest action was submitted to Baltimore’s Public Access Channel 75. Check this site:www.cmbc.tv/
for the time and date of that program.
 

Views

Account Login



Forgot your password?

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software