Baltimore IMC : http://baltimore.indymedia.org
Baltimore IMC

Commentary :: Poverty

Rob Us If You Must, But Socialism Scares Us

A possible explanation of why Americans are so complacent about being massively robbed by capitalists time after time
In the past 30 years Americans have been openly robbed by capitalists so many times that it is difficult to keep track of all of them. There was the Savings and Loan heist, the fraudulent accounting schemes of Arthur Andersen and others, which led to a stock market crash and wiped out people's savings, there was the blatant thievery of Enron and the rest of the energy companies, costing billions of dollars in public money, and finally, there was the sub prime mortgage debacle, which put the whole world into a depression, cost millions of jobs and made numerous people homeless and penniless.

One would logically believe that there should be millions of Americans in the streets demanding an end to the system which caused all of the present misery and angrier than a hive of hornets towards those who robbed them- the capitalists. One would be greatly mistaken. They are angry at the people who would like to help them. They are very frightened, not at the robbers, but at two little words- socialism and communism. It is like a drowning person who refuses to be saved because the person offering assistance believes in one of those evil, evil words. Even stranger, they are more frightened at the more Utopian word, "communism," than the other less Utopian word, "socialism." If I went up to most Americans and told them I was a socialist, they would be shocked, but if I told some Americans I was a communist, I would probably have to use the electrical shock paddles to get their heartbeat started again. Most astonishing is that most of these people can't give a rational explanation of either word- except to say they are evil and un-American. Sometimes, they have completely fallacious interpretations like believing socialism means sharing all your personal possessions with everyone else, or it means loss of freedom or a dictatorship. None of these things are true. The only reason a socialist state has to be somewhat restrictive is that it is under attack by a capitalist power like the United States.

I notice all these people at the town hall meetings on health care yelling about socialism and communism. Now, I know that a lot of this is organized by the health care companies because they know single payer health insurance would put them out of business. However, they don't need to organize very hard because I have relatives and friends who would be terribly shocked, scared and think evil of me if they thought I was either a socialist or communist. The corporate propaganda system in this country have reached the pinnacle of their success in reversing good and evil and creating the illusion that the interests of the poor are the same as those of the rich.

I would like to examine this reversal of evil and good. I was rereading Jennifer Harbury's book Bridge of Courage about the struggle of the mainly Mayan revolutionaries in Guatemala against government troops trained by the CIA and the School of the Americas in the 1980s and 1990s. The Mayan guerrillas wanted land reform, help for the poor people, and a cooperative society. That doesn't sound evil to me. However, government forces were taught by the CIA that all who wanted to help the poor were communists and evil. When asked why they tortured and killed priests and nuns, that was their answer. They burned Mayan villages and killed all the inhabitants. The army's excuse for the burning of hundreds of villages was that the villagers were helping the communists. According to eyewitness descriptions, while the army was killing the men and raping and killing the women, they used knives to disembowel the children, yelling they were killing the seeds of communism. Now, this is real evil, done by the proponents of capitalism. This is where American tax money went in the 1980s and that is what was happening while contented Americans watched the NFL on Sunday. They believed Ronald Reagan when he said that these reports by human rights groups and eyewitnesses were distortions and lies. The American people should be deeply ashamed of themselves for what happened then. I know most Americans are not child and baby killers.

Can all this ignorance be attributed solely to the propaganda system or has the advent of television and the computer had something to do with the dumbing down of America? Americans certainly don't read as much as they once did, and they rarely read important books on history or masterpieces of literature. They pick up these books prominently displayed right at the front of the bookstore, and usually, it is a biography of some idiot in public office or a variety of other books from the numerous fools at Fox News. Europeans are appalled at the ignorance of the average American about world affairs.

Despite this general level of ignorance on exceedingly important topics, American universities can produce engineers and scientists with specialized knowledge to produce the sophisticated weaponry needed to keep the poor of other countries under the iron heel of capitalism. The United States has the intelligence necessary to build an empire and possibly destroy the world in an attempt to keep and expand it, but I am afraid does not have the humanistic knowledge and will to save Mankind or the environment. It will take a whole community of socialist governments to accomplish that.
 
 

This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.

Comments

Re: Rob Us If You Must, But Socialism Scares Us

I am a person of worth

Anne Wortham is Associate Professor of Sociology at Illinois State University and continuing Visiting Scholar at Stanford University 's Hoover Institution. She is a member of the American Sociological Association and the American Philosophical Association. She has been a John M. Olin Foundation Faculty Fellow, and honored as a Distinguished Alumni of the Year by the National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education. In fall 1988 she was one of a select group of intellectuals who were featured in Bill Moyer's television series, "A World of Ideas." The transcript of her conversation with Moyers has been published in his book, A World of Ideas. Dr. Wortham is author of "The Other Side of Racism: A Philosophical Study of Black Race Consciousness" which analyzes how race consciousness is transformed into political strategies and policy issues. She has published numerous articles on the implications of individual rights for civil rights policy, and is currently writing a book on theories of social and cultural marginality. Recently, she has published articles on the significance of multiculturalism and Afrocentricism in education, the politics of victimization and the social and political impact of political correctness. Shortly after an interview in 2004, she was awarded tenure. This article by her is something.

Fellow Americans, Please know: I am Black; I grew up in the segregated South. I did not vote for Barack Obama; I wrote in Ron Paul's name as my choice for president. Most importantly, I am not race conscious. I do not require a Black president to know that I am a person of worth, and that life is worth living. I do not require a Black president to love the ideal of America . I cannot join you in your celebration. I feel no elation. There is no smile on my face. I am not jumping with joy. There are no tears of triumph in my eyes. For such emotions and behavior to come from me, I would have to deny all that I know about the requirements of human flourishing and survival - all that I know about the history of the United States of America , all that I know about American race relations, and all that I know about Barack Obama as a politician. I would have to deny the nature of the "change" that Obama asserts has come to America . Most importantly, I would have to abnegate my certain understanding that you have chosen to sprint down the road to serfdom that we have been on for over a century. I would have to pretend that individual liberty has no value for the success of a human life. I would have to evade your rejection of the slender reed of capitalism on which your success and mine depend. I would have to think it somehow rational that 94 percent of the 12 million Blacks in this country voted for a man because he looks like them (that Blacks are permitted to play the race card), and that they were joined by self-declared "progressive" whites who voted for him because he doesn't look like them. I would have to wipe my mi nd clean of all that I know about the kind of people who have advised and taught Barack Obama and will fill posts in his administration - pol itical intellectuals like my former colleagues at the Harvard University 's Kennedy School of Government. I would have to believe that "fairness" is equivalent of justice. I would have to believe that man who asks me to "go forward in a new spirit of service, in a new service of sacrifice" is speaking in my interest. I would have to accept the premise of a man that economic prosperity comes from the "bottom up", and who arrogantly believes that he can will it into existence by the use of government force. I would have to admire a man who thinks the standard of living of the masses can be improved by destroying the most productive and the generators of wealth. Finally, Americans, I would have to erase from my consciousness the scene of 125,000 screaming, crying, cheering people in Grant Park, Chicago irrationally chanting "Yes We Can!" Finally, I would have to wipe all memory of all the times I have heard politicians, pundits, journalists, editorialists, bloggers and intellectuals declare that capitalism is dead - and no one, including especially Alan Greenspan, objected to their assumption that the particular version of the anti-capitalistic mentality that they want to replace with their own version of anti-capitalism is anything remotely equivalent to capitalism. So you have made history, Americans. You and your children have elected a Black man to the office of the president of the United States , the wounded giant of the world. The battle between John Wayne and Jane Fonda is over - and that Fonda won. Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern must be very happy men. Jimmie Carter, too. And the Kennedys have at last gotten their Kenned y look-a-like. The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs can feel warm moments of satisfaction for having elected a Black person. So, toast yourselves: 60s countercultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 9 0s bourgeois bohemians. Toast yourselves, Black America. Shout your glee Harvard, Princeton , Yale, Duke, Stanford, and Berkeley. You have elected not an individual who is qualified to be president, but a Black man who, like the pragmatist Franklin Roosevelt, promises to - Do Something! You now have someone who has picked up the baton of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. But you have also foolishly traded your freedom and mine - what little there is left - for the chance to feel good. There is nothing in me that can share your happy obliviousness.
 

Views

Account Login



Forgot your password?

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software