This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.
worcester
western mass
vermont
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
seattle
sarasota
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
dc
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin indymedia
austin
atlanta
asheville
arkansas
arizona
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
toscana
torun
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
sardegna
russia
romania
roma
portugal
poland
piemonte
patras
paris/Île-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
nottingham imc
norway
northern england
nice
netherlands
napoli
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
london
lombardia
linksunten
lille
liguria
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
emilia-romagna
cyprus
croatia
calabria
bulgaria
brussels
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant
abruzzoThis site made manifest by dadaIMC software
Comments
refuse and resist avakianism
Questions to an RCP Supporter
From: bit.ly/Ow11F
* Why the silence about Nepal?
* Why this “cultural revolution” in the Party?
* Why have so many people left?
* Where is the “wild and wooly debate”?
* Why are they accusing critics of counterrevolution?
* Why are they constantly talking about threats to their leaders and organizations?
* What really is the New Synthesis?
* How does it actually differ from communism that has come before?
* Is it a correct synthesis that will lead to the development of a revolutionary movement and a revolution in fact?
* Why are they holding a line that “Avakian is a cardinal question” or the equivalent of (if not greater than) Marx, Lenin and Mao?
* Is this justified?
* How do you know the answers to any of these question?
* What is the basis for your decision to agree with Avakian and the RCP?
* Is it a well studied analysis of what Avakian and the RCP have to say in light of what communist theory has held in the past, and in light of what the current conditions are in the world?
* Or do you make your decision based on something else?
* Is it because you are afraid to lose your identity as a communist?
* Is it because you are afraid to lose friends and family?
* Is it because you are afraid to think critically and find that the RCP’s math doesn’t add up?
From Inside the RCP: Why This Party Can’t Lead a Revolution
bit.ly/csdrA
New Constitution of RCP: Faltering Organization Stamped by Avakianism
bit.ly/nmJ2O
A Comrade’s Letter: Inside the RCP’s Rectification
bit.ly/diWS3
Ulises Subida: The Vision & Method of the RCP’s Polemics
bit.ly/2lMXEW
On Althusser and the RCP in Decline
bit.ly/68bY4
9 Letters to Our Comrades
bit.ly/3puVI
Opposing Lines on Maoist Revolution: RCP,USA and CP of Nepal (Maoist)
bit.ly/fqENT