Baltimore IMC : http://baltimore.indymedia.org
Baltimore IMC

News :: [none]

Baltimore City Council Passes Resolution Against USA Patriot Act

Text of approved Baltimore City Council resolution against the USA Patriot Act.
City of Baltimore Council Resolution

Introduced by: Council Member Abayomi

Preservation of Civil Liberties Resolution-USA Patriot Act

For the purpose of defending the civil liberties and civil rights of all individuals living in Baltimore City.

WHEREAS, the City of Baltimore recognizes the Constitution of the United States of America to be the supreme law of the land, which all public servants are sworn to uphold; and

WHEREAS, the City of Baltimore greatly benefits from the many contributions of its highly diverse population, which includes people from around the world, and is vital to our city's unique character; and

WHEREAS, the City of Baltimore is a major international port and recognizes its unique position to maintain prosperous relationships with all nations; and

WHEREAS, government security measures that undermine fundamental rights do damage to the American institutions and values that the residents of the City of Baltimore hold dear;

WHEREAS the Council of the City of Baltimore believes that there is no inherent conflict between national security and the preservation of liberty-Americans can be both safe and free;

WHEREAS federal policies adopted since September 11, 2001, including provisions in the USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law 107-56) and related executive orders, regulations and actions threaten fundamental rights and liberties by;

(a) Authorizing the indefinite incarceration of non-citizens based on mere suspicion, and the indefinite incarceration of citizens designated by the President as "enemy combatants" without access to counsel or meaningful recourse to the federal courts;

(b) Limiting the traditional authority of federal courts to curb law enforcement abuse of electronic surveillance in anti-terrorism investigations and ordinary criminal investigations;

(c) Expanding the authority of federal agents to conduct so-called "sneak and peak" or "black bag" searches, in which the subject of the search warrant is unaware that his property has been searched;

(d) Granting law enforcement and intelligence agencies broad access to personal medical, financial, library and education records with little if any judicial oversight;

(e) Chilling constitutionally protected speech through overbroad definitions of "terrorism";

(f) Driving a wedge between immigrant communities and the police that protect them by encouraging involvement of state and local police in enforcement of federal immigration law;

(g) Permitting the FBI to conduct surveillance of religious services, internet chat rooms, political demonstrations, and other public meetings or any kind without having any evidence that a crime has been or may be committed;

WHEREAS these expanded powers have and will pose a particular threat to the civil rights and liberties of the residents of our city. Powers granted by Congress to government agencies are seldom retracted and government agencies including the Defense, State, and Justice Departments which have been granted greater surveillance and investigative powers under the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001 may not be willing to abandon those powers by 2005, and therefore these agencies along with the Administration may seek to amend, adjust, or repeal the sunset provisions of PATRIOT Act Title II. It is incumbent upon Congress to ensure that these powers granted by the USA PATRIOT Act are limited in scope and effect to whatever extent Congress has stated in the Act that such powers are to be so limited; and

WHEREAS new legislation has been drafted by the Administration entitled the Domestic Security Enhancement Act (DSEA) (also known as PATRIOT II) which contains a multitude of new and sweeping law enforcement and intelligence gathering powers, many of which are not related to terrorism, that would severely dilute, if not undermine, many basic constitutional rights, as well as disturb our unique system of checks and balances by:

(a) diminishing personal privacy by removing important checks on government surveillance authority,

(b) reduce the accountability of government to the public by increasing government secrecy,

(c) expanding the definition of "terrorism" in a manner that threatens the constitutionally protected rights of Americans, and

(d) seriously erode the right of all persons to due process of law.

WHEREAS, the City of Baltimore recognizes that an infringement of the constitutionally guaranteed rights of any person, under the color of law, is an abuse of power, and a breach of the public trust, a misappropriation of public resources, a violation of civil rights and is beyond the scope of governmental authority.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALTIMORE remains firmly committed to the protection of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. The City of Baltimore will completely avoid discrimination in every function of city government, and vigorously uphold the constitutionally protected rights of all persons to peacefully protest and express their political views without any form of governmental interference.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Baltimore joins communities across the nation in expressing concerns regarding provisions in the USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law 107-56), related executive orders, regulations and actions threaten fundamental rights and liberties guaranteed under the United States Constitution.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER RESOLVED, and is the policy of the City of Baltimore, that the council of the city of Baltimore:

1. Directs the Police Department of the City of Baltimore to:

a. Refrain from enforcing immigration matters, which are entirely the responsibility of the Department of Homeland Security. No city service will be denied on the basis of citizenship; and

b. Refrain from engaging in the surveillance of individuals or groups of individuals based on their participation in activities protected by the First Amendment, such as political advocacy or the practice of a religion, without particularized suspicion of criminal activity unrelated to the activity protected by the First Amendment; and

c. Refrain from utilizing racial profiling or religious profiling as factors in selecting which
individuals to subject to investigatory activities except when seeking to apprehend a specific suspect whose race, religion, ethnicity or national origin is part of the description of the suspect; and

d. Refrain, whether acting alone or with federal or state law enforcement officers, from collecting or maintaining information about the political, religious or social views, associations or activities of any individual, group, association, organization, corporation, business or partnership unless such information directly relates to an investigation of criminal activities, and there are reasonable grounds to suspect the subject of the information is or may be involved in criminal conduct; and

e. Refrain from undertaking or participating in any initiative, such as the Terrorism Information and Prevention System (TIPS), that encourages members of the general public to spy on their neighbors, colleagues or customers; and

f. Refrain from using racial profiling to stop drivers or pedestrians for the purpose of scrutinizing their identification documents without particularized suspicion of criminal activity; and

g. Report to the city council any request by federal authorities that, if granted, would cause agencies of the City of Baltimore to exercise or cooperate in the exercise of powers in apparent violation of any city ordinance of the laws or Constitution of this State or the United States.

2. Directs public libraries within the City of Baltimore to post in a prominent place within the library a notice to library users as follows: "WARNING: Under Section 215 of the federal USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law 107-56), records of the books and other materials you borrow from this library may be obtained by federal agents. That federal law prohibits librarians from informing you if federal agents have obtained records about you. Questions about this policy should be directed to: Attorney General John Ashcroft, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530".

3. Directs the City Council Chief of Staff to:

a. Transmit a copy of this resolution to Senators Barbara Mikulski and Paul Sarbanes, and Representatives Elijah Cummings, Dutch Ruppersberger and Roscoe Bartlett accompanied by a letter urging them to monitor federal anti-terrorism tactics and work to repeal provisions of the USA PATRIOT ACT and other laws and regulations that infringe on civil rights and liberties. And to take all possible actions to lead Congressional action to prohibit passage of the DSEA. And to support our United States Congress in their efforts to oversee and assess the impacts of the PATRIOT Act and to ensure that the sunset date of Title III of the Act remains in force and is honored, thereby supporting all Congressional efforts to ensure that Congress enacts the required joint resolution on or before October 1, 2005 to inactivate Title. ; and

b. Transmit a copy of this resolution to Governor Robert Ehrlich, and appropriate members of the State Legislature, accompanied by a letter urging them to ensure that state anti-terrorism laws and policies be implemented in a manner that does not infringe on civil liberties as described in this resolution; and

c. Transmit a copy of this resolution to President George W. Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft.

See also: U.S.A. Patriot Act Takes Hit at Baltimore City Council Hearing, Looking Down the Rabbit Hole: The "Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003" and Safe in America: C. William Michaels' new book.

See also the report on the passing of the resolution "Baltimore Upholds Constitution..."
baltimore.indymedia.org/newswire/display/4103/index.php
 
 

This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.

Comments

We are safe now.

I have to say, this bill is an impressive stride to secure the safety of our people. I think we should just hurry and sign over all basic civil liberties at once. I mean why resist the inevitable, right? Write one bill that takes it all, instead of inch-by-inch, and day after day. Stop hiding under the guise of Democracy. Lets just embrace the reality of Fascism. Open your doors, let the police in, you have nothing to hide.

Wouldn’t you feel safer with a policeman in every home? How about to maximize efficiency, to cover more ground, (strictly in the name of Homeland Security, of course) we put cameras in there instead. Every room. One officer could protect 50 homes. We could effectively “protect and serve,” while insuring freedom, AND streamlining the judicial system. Think of the benefits:

We can cut taxes, and because municipal costs will be substantially reduced. The need for large police forces would become obsolete. One officer becomes 50…or 100. We’ll finally be protected, from even from ourselves. Evil foreigners will no longer be able to wage their anti-American agendas, no more terrorism. We can enforce the peace.

The “burden of evidence” is now obsolete. Criminals will never go unpunished. There is always a witness, and, because of the modern marvels of technology, we always have evidence. No more of these criminals slipping through the cracks. Justice will finally become a staple in our society.

The need for jails will be reduced. Capital punishment will never have to face appeal again, as there will always be accurate evidence, and thus we can shoot them onsite, and dispatch a coroner automatically. We will have nothing left to fear from Deviant criminals. We are safe now.

We can finally purge ourselves of the scourge that threaten our future. No more drug addicts, no more robbery. No more places to smuggle, no more conspiracies, no more juvenile delinquents, no more truancy, no more playing with matches, no more of our youth tainted with alcohol, or pornography, or indecency, no more murder, no more rape, no more torture, no more kidnapping, no more adultery, no more envy, no more sloth, no more greed, no more jealousy, no more gluttony, no more pride, (other than Patriotism - which is required), no more wrath, no more lust, nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. We can finally enforce freedom.

We can create billions in revenue, and stimulate our free-market economy, by allowing focus groups access to the police network. We will be able to predict trends, and stimulate spending faster, with direct input. Each home could be outfitted with the appropriate commercials, based on specific demographics. We can enforce consumerism.

The people will truly be in control! Isn’t that wonderful? So quickly sign the dotted line, feel assured, it only cost you mere privacy. A small investment, with profit for all.

Utopia is at hand.

A sterile, safe, society of socialist-supremacy, steadily advancing our people. Democracy will be upgraded; bureaucracy will be eliminated; civilization will reach a new peak. Welcome to the 21st century, the dawn of greatness, and the midnight of liberty. You are safe now.

-Nathan North
 

Re: Baltimore City Council Passes Resolution Against USA Patriot Act

An Open Letter to the residents of Baltimore and the Press Corps: I read with interest a lengthy article, in the New York Times, documenting the journalistic fraud committed by Jayson Blair, former employee of the Times. The Sacramento Bee ran an article on it in Monday, 12th Metro Section. I find it puzzling, however, that while the journalists are willing to expose one of their own who has violated a sacred journalistic code, as well as some moral edicts, the outright lies of the Bush administration can go on unabated and unchallenged. Perhaps the same pattern of “limited journalistic oversight” seen in the Blair case still infects the Times and almost all of the major and minor newspapers in this country. Where are the weapons of mass destruction so thoroughly touted by Bush and Powell? Where is Hussein and why is he not being sought? And what ever happened to Bin Laden? Are these stories merely concoctions, or are they just old news? My problem with this and other issues in this country that are not being discussed by our media is that the information is readily available, and still our national press refuses to discuss it. The lack of interest in stories that are clearly and obviously relevant to a democracy trying to survive the onslaught of lies, half-truths, and second-hand, third-hand, fourth-hand and just plain made up stories issued by the Bush administration is frightening. It tells me that we have lost the war to protect our democracy from dying for lack of the one thing it needs the most – information. Those of us in the private sector, without direct access to a news vehicle to launch our concerns and to give the results of our own investigations, are at the mercy of the media. If you won’t question it, or report it, or even mention it, what has become of the alleged role of the press – that of providing information to the electorate? As an anthropologist, educator, and humanist, I argue that newspapers in this country have not only abdicated the responsibility to protect the electorate from the inaccuracies of Jayson Blair, but have failed as journalistic organs to report the inaccuracies, deceits, lies, distortions, and outright criminal behavior on the part of the current administration. For example, I have seen the photos that are spread from one end of the internet to the other – completely world-wide – of the Pentagon building immediately after the “impact” of what was alleged to be “Flight 77”. No 757 or 767 ever made created that small hole. Where is the debris? Why was the lawn of the Pentagon covered immediately with sand? The pictures of the aftermath show no crash site or damage to the area – yet it was covered completely. Go and look at the damage yourselves instead of hiding behind some “doctrine of journalistic integrity”. I looked at the data from Andrews Air Base in the aftermath of the 9/11 disaster. Why were the jets not scrambled for nearly an hour, and only after the Pentagon was “struck”? Why were there conflicting stories coming from our government, and why in any other case of planes deviating from a flight plan are Air Force jets routinely scrambled within minutes? I challenge you to find the truth and report it. I challenge you to stand up to the criminal deceit of the Bush administration instead of cowering in the darkness of “unpatriotic” fear, and I challenge you – I dare you – to live up to the expectations of an increasing angry electorate who will not take the lies, distortions, and deceit much longer. While president cowboy – president top-gun – cavorts to the obvious pleasure of the media and flaunts his disgraceful message of environmental demise, his disgraceful tax credits to the corporate oligopolies who already have their hands in the taxpayers pockets, his disgraceful butchery of innocent civilians in Iraq, his disgraceful insider contracts to Halliburton in the aftermath of the “war” in Iraq, his disgraceful scuttling of health care in a society where over 40 million people have no health care at all, and his disgraceful gutting of programs directly affecting over 30 million poverty-stricken, homeless, hungry, and unemployed people in this country, one of our most trusted news media takes the time to right wrongs committed in its own house by one of its own employees. Thanks for cleaning up the “house of journalistic truth” – we will all sleep better tonight for that one, but that is not enough to buy back “journalistic integrity”. Why not get off your dead – but oh, so patriotic – asses and cover the real stories. Jim Snoke Anthropologist, Educator, and Humanist 2816 Hillcrest Drive Cameron Park, CA 95682
 

Re: Baltimore City Council Passes Resolution Against USA Patriot Act

GOYA/KOD is something that was drilled into my by my J101 professor...

(Get off your asses/knock on doors)
 

Re: Baltimore City Council Passes Resolution Against USA Patriot Act

I do not understand the meaning of this sentence in the resolution. Would you please explain it?
"...thereby supporting all Congressional efforts to ensure that Congress enacts the required joint resolution on or before October 1, 2005 to inactivate Title. ;"
What does it mean to inactivate Title?
 

Re: Baltimore City Council Passes Resolution Against USA Patriot Act

I would guess that the line "...thereby supporting all Congressional efforts to ensure that Congress enacts the required joint resolution on or before October 1, 2005 to inactivate Title. " is refering to Title III of the Patriot Act, which is referanced earlier in the sentence. It appears that the City Council resolution is urging that Baltimore's congresspeople push for the passing of a resolution in the U.S. Congress that would ensure that Title III of the Patriot Act sunsets when it is supposed to (ie, Oct. 1, 2005).

Just my guesswork.
 

Views

Account Login

Calendar

No events for this day.

view calendar week
add an event

Donations

Help support us!

RSS Syndication

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software