Baltimore IMC : http://baltimore.indymedia.org
Baltimore IMC

Commentary :: U.S. Government

What Really Hit the South Tower on 9/11/01? (Scott Loughrey)

Scott Loughrey describes his trip to New York on 9/11/04 where he asked eyewitnesses what they saw strike the World Trade Center.
Just what hit the South Tower of the World Trade Center on 9/11/01 at 9:03 a.m.? That’s the question that I sought to answer as I visited New York for the excellent 911 conference (“Confronting the Evidence”, 9/11/2004) held at the Grand Ballroom which was sponsored by Jimmy Walker.

I’m sure that most people have heard what some conspiracy nuts are saying. They point out that when Flight 175 entered the South Tower no part of it broke off. The argument they make is that because a plane is largely aluminum it should have produced major confetti with its impact against the South Tower’s steel exterior.

Then there’s the overly-simplistic observation that the damage seen in some photos of the other (North Tower) did not match the footage obtained by the Naudet Brothers. I trust that everyone remembers the Naudet Brothers. Their documentary ‘911’ is an inspiration.

Conspiracy nutters also mention that there’s no known recording of Flight 175’s impact with the South Tower. Oh, we’ve got the object's deceleration and the explosion covered. But the actual, gut-wrenching sound of a largely-aluminum fuselage making contact with steel at an estimated 450 mph was never revealed to the public by anyone.

Having read these idiotic theories (no, actually having written some of them) I arrived at Lispenard and Church Streets in New York in the early afternoon of 9/11/04. It is an attractive location; and quite famous. This was where Jules Naudet captured Flight 11 striking the North Tower three years before. (The Naudets also publish a shot of someone watching the North Tower hit. Not bad considering they were ostensibly videotaping a Fire Chief inspecting a gas leak.)

About a half hour later I am standing on the sidewalk outside of Engine 7 Ladder 1, the firehouse on Duane Street where the Naudet Brothers were shooting their documentary about a rookie firefighter. The Naudets were so enthralled with their simple, colorless "probie" that they spent months shooting candid video of the firemen at this firehouse. I merely look at the firehouse from the outside for several angry minutes before heading to Ground Zero.

Upon arriving I see people pouring in for the demonstrations which are taking place on the three-year anniversary of the most tragic day in US history. A large number of bikers are riding endlessly around the block, showing the American flags attached to their finely-tuned machines. I ask many people whether they saw the object which struck the South Tower. Since most of the people I speak to are tourists very few answer in the affirmative. Finally I encounter a young, pretty French girl. She tells me she saw Flight 11 strike the North Tower. I ask her a few questions and she is not comfortable answering them. However, she tells me that only when she saw the explosion on the North Tower did she know it was a plane. I interpret her remarks to indicate that she may not have seen Flight 11 at all. (Perhaps she knows that what she saw more closely resembles a Flying Pig than a commercial jet?)

Soon afterwards I speak to a man who tells me he saw a windowless, gray cargo plane strike the South Tower. We talk at length and he makes this point very clear several times.

I talk to another man who tells me he saw a commercial jet strike the South Tower. I ask him a couple of questions about what it looked like and he quickly gets frustrated and terminates the conversation. I try to talk to a couple of other eyewitnesses but they won’t talk to me. I then hail a cab and head uptown for the Grand Ballroom event.

In the cab I come to the conclusion that someone other than Osama bin Laden sent a grey cargo plane into the South Tower. Meanwhile, the TV networks aired video of a CGI plane striking it. As absurd as it sounds, what eyewitnesses saw strike the South Tower must have been different than what TV audiences saw. This explains why so many eyewitnesses are reluctant to talk about a visual spectacle which rivals the Hindenberg disaster. 911 was actually a news media hoax, a monumental PsyOps campaign that was inflicted upon the Human Race by the corporate US media.

I’ll leave to the eyewitnesses to come forward and describe what they saw.

Scott Loughrey
 
 

This content is now locked, and no comments may be added.

Comments

Re: What Really Hit the South Tower on 9/11/01? (Scott Loughrey)

Did either Flight 11 or 175 exist? Typically, routine flight schedules are repeated; for example, if you miss flight 344 at 4pm to from BWI to Miami on Monday, you can catch flight 344 at 4pm from BWI to Miami on Tuesday.

Were flights 75 & 11 of this routine nature? If so, there should be a record of them taking off. Is there a record of them landing anywhere? Did they leave with passengers? If so, what happened to the passengers? Are they being held prisoner somewhere?

If the flights existed, were those flights associated with specific planes in the airline's inventory? Has anyone looked into the status of those airplanes? If there's a conspiracy, are those airlines involved?

These are some very basic questions. I'd be curious to hear the answers, or an explanation as to why these are not basic questions.
 

researching the flights

"These are some very basic questions. I'd be curious to hear the answers, or an explanation as to why these are not basic questions."

Basic questions but leading ones. I have not researched what happened to the planes. So, your question is better asked of those who have. Meanwhile, 911 Truth is not a deductive argument where one can focus on the weak link of a theory in order to discredit the whole. As author David Ray Griffin writes, it is a cumulative argument. That means that the sum of the evidence which conflicts with the official story is what's relevant, not whether any piece of it doesn't hold up.

I haven't researched the planes but I've got probably a couple of hundred unread emails in my inbox from people who have. For example, Gerard Holmgren, a close colleague of mine, was the first person to discover that the flights did not appear in the Bureau of Transportation Statistics database. Here's kind of an overview of what Gerard found:
www.nineeleven.co.uk/dialoguewithholmgren.htm

In addition, a German researcher named "WoodyBox" has been investigating whether the real planes (and passengers) were diverted to Cleveland. He's got a four-part series with information on this subject:
inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php

In addition, if one visits the website "Democratic Underground" (www.DemocraticUnderground.com) there is a lot of information about the BTS database and what WoodyBox is saying, particularly from "Naserian".

Yes Jim, you're asking basic questions. There are people actively trying to answer them. Meanwhile, there is a great deal of information that is verifiable right now that can be used to bring down the official story of 911--and hopefully the perpetrators in the process.

Cheers,
Scott
 

Re: What Really Hit the South Tower on 9/11/01? (Scott Loughrey)

Now,that Bin Laden confessed it was he who is
responsible for 911 all the conspiracy-Theory's
are null &void.Or is Bin Laden himself a coworker
for the Neocons?Everything is possible in our
world of political deception.Divide et impera!
 

Re: What Really Hit the South Tower on 9/11/01? (Scott Loughrey)

What Really Hit the South Tower on 9/11/01?
United 175.
 

Views

Account Login



Forgot your password?

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software